To manage their accounts in the Flickr image hosting website. "Frogr is a small application for the GNOME desktop that allows users Nowadays, the "official" description that's used everywhere is something like this: Since frogr 0.3 flickcurl is not being used anymore, as we used our own libsoup-based library called flicksoup, which is not being released separately yet (its development happens inside the frogr tree at the moment). > communicate with the server through the publicly available flickr REST API. > Frogr intends to be a complete GNOME application to remotely manage a flickr Now, just a couple of comments that I hope you'll find useful: As the main developer of frogr so far, please let me say thanks for you reporting this bug and pushing for getting frogr integrated in Fedora. The Scottish Government is committed to publishing all information released in response to Freedom of Information requests. If you wish to consider, please contact us at the address below and we will be happy to provide. Under regulation 6(1)(b) of the EIRs, we do not have to give you information which is already publicly available and easily accessible to you in another form or format.Ĥ. The answer to your question is that there are none approved.ĭue to the size of the files we are unable to upload the documents referred to above. Some of the information you have requested is available from the following link: Due to the size of the documents (56 PDF items in total relevant to points 2 & 3 of your request) these will be provided via a shared Workspace in an online storage facility called “Objective Connect.” Details of how to access this are provided in our point 2 above. You will then be able to enter the Workspace and click on the zipped folder to download all the documents released.ģ. I enclose a copy of some of the information you requested in the format you asked for. In order to access the shared Workspace files you will need to enter your email address and a password of your choice. To access the documents via Objective Connect you will need to click on the link provided in my accompanying email. Due to the size of the documents (56 PDF items in total relevant to points 2 & 3 of your request) I will separately email you an invitation to a shared Workspace in an online storage facility called “Objective Connect.” This online storage facility is now the Scottish Government’s preferred way to share large and/or numerous files. This is essentially a technical point and has no material effect on the outcome of your request.Ģ. I am providing copies of some of the information you have requested. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption, because there is no public interest in dealing with the same request under two different regimes. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. This exemption is subject to the 'public interest test'. We are applying the exemption at section 39(2) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA), so that we do not also have to deal with your request under FOISA. ResponseĪs the information you have requested is 'environmental information' for the purposes of the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 (EIRs), we are required to deal with your request under those Regulations. If Marine Scotland does allow the use of any type of ADD on Scottish fish farms without an EPS licence, please supply a list of the approved devices, their sound characteristics and the scientific basis for allowing their use in locations where there is a reasonable expectation that cetaceans might be present. Please also assist me by identifying and supplying electronic copies of all correspondence with and guidance issued to fish farming companies and aquaculture trade bodies, including the SSPO, about the suitability of different types of ADD for current use on Scottish fish farms, with regard to the disturbance or injury of cetaceans by those devices, in the absence of an EPS licence. Please assist me by identifying and supplying electronic copies of all correspondence with OTAQ and other manufacturers and suppliers of ADDs about the current use of ADDs by Scottish fish farms, particularly regarding their ability to disturb or injure cetaceans. Has Marine Scotland approved the use of these or any other acoustic deterrent devices as definitely not capable of disturbing porpoises?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |